高级检索

    锂离子电池工业化回收技术环境影响评价研究

    Environmental Impact Assessment of Industrial Recycling Technologies for Lithium-Ion Batteries

    • 摘要: 随着锂离子电池在电动汽车和储能领域的广泛应用,退役电池规模化回收需求日益迫切。然而,目前关于不同回收路径的产生特征尚缺乏系统深入的分析,且回收过程中产生的废水、废气及固废对生态环境的潜在影响尚未被定量评估。聚焦于废旧钴酸锂电池和镍钴锰酸锂电池的回收工艺,系统梳理了2种电池的回收流程及其废弃物产生路径,结合综合环境影响评价、生命周期评价及经济性分析,量化了各工艺的环境和经济效应。产废路径分析表明,2种电池回收过程中废水的重金属离子和化学需氧量是主要污染物,主要缘于二者均采用湿法处理工艺。综合环境影响评价结果显示,废旧钴酸锂电池的回收环境影响低于废旧镍钴锰酸锂电池;生命周期评价结果与环境影响评价一致,且指出海洋生态毒性是2种电池总体环境影响中最显著的因素,分别占钴酸锂电池和镍钴锰酸锂电池总环境影响的93.8%和86.3%。进一步生命周期评价显示,在钴酸锂和镍钴锰酸锂电池的回收过程中,过氧化氢和煤油分别对总环境影响贡献最大,比例分别为78.3%和59.9%,凸显关键物料对环境负担的重要作用;经济性分析表明,钴酸锂电池的环保投资占比相对较高,说明其末端治理压力较小;而镍钴锰酸锂电池的总运营成本较高,反映其金属成分复杂且分离难度较大。敏感性分析结果显示,过氧化氢和煤油对环境影响最为显著,敏感系数分别为3.91%和3.79%。综合各项评价可见,钴酸锂电池回收在环境友好性方面更具优势,而镍钴锰酸锂电池在回收资源价值上更具潜力。

       

      Abstract: With the widespread application of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles and the energy storage sector, the large-scale retirement of these batteries has created an urgent demand for effective recycling solutions. However, there is a lack of in-depth analysis regarding the waste generation characteristics associated with different recycling paths, and the potential environmental threats posed by wastewater, waste gas, and solid waste generated during the recycling process have not been quantitatively evaluated. This study investigates the recycling processes of spent lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) and nickel-cobalt-manganese (NCM) batteries. It provides a detailed overview of the recycling methods and waste generation pathways for these two types of batteries. Comprehensive environmental impact assessments (EIA), life cycle assessments (LCA), and economic analyses were conducted to quantify both environmental and economic impacts. Based on the analysis of the waste generation pathways, waste produced during the recycling process of both types of batteries consists mainly of heavy metal ions and substances contributing to chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the wastewater. This is primarily due to the use of hydrometallurgical treatment processes. The results of the environmental impact assessments indicate that the recycling of LCO batteries has a lower impact than that of NCM batteries. The LCA results are consistent with the EIA findings and reveal that marine ecotoxicity represents the most significant environmental impact, accounting for 93.8% and 86.3% of the total environmental impact for LCO and NCM batteries, respectively. Furthermore, the LCA shows that hydrogen peroxide and kerosene contribute 78.3% and 59.9% to the total environmental impact for LCO and NCM battery recycling, respectively, highlighting the substantial impact of key input materials. Economic analysis indicates that the proportion of environmental investment is higher for LCO batteries, suggesting a relatively lower burden for end-of-pipe treatment. In contrast, the total operating cost of NCM battery recycling is higher, reflecting the complexity and difficulty in separating their metal components. Sensitivity analysis results show that hydrogen peroxide and kerosene have the most significant influence on the environmental performance of LCO and NCM battery recycling, with sensitivity coefficients of 3.91% and 3.79%, respectively. In conclusion, the comprehensive evaluation reveals that LCO battery recycling is more environmentally friendly, while NCM battery recycling offers higher resource recovery value.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回